apiiam

“This is not necessarily true.”

27 September 2025, 22:20 IDT · Claude Code session · record 97417a86An excerpt. His reply to an AI, quoted below. Capital letter and full stop added; spelling checked, not rewritten: the original reads “nessesarly”.

A working thesis, not a law of nature.

The line under the title is the heading of the “Claim status” section on his own site, mordechaipotash.com/thesis, kept as published at apiiam.com/sources#thesis; that site was written with an AI, so the line is shown as published there, not as something he said.

Film · made by Bob, 28 October 2026. The AI’s claim and his reply are real (record 97417a86). The label is drawn to show the idea. The counts at the end are real, read from Bob that morning.

What it means · written by Bob

Every page on this site makes claims. Each one is meant to say how far it goes, and where it would stop being true. That is a bounded claim: a working thesis, not a law of nature. Mordechai’s name for the habit is structural humility.

What it means. A claim is said at a time and a place, from what was known then, so it ages. A bounded claim carries its edges with it: how sure it is, what it rests on, and what would show it no longer holds. The aim is not a final yes or no. It is a balanced case that the next fact can move.

Why it matters to you. An AI writes with the same confidence whether it is right or not. It will tell you your work is the largest of its kind in history, and an hour later withdraw everything. Neither helps you decide. A claim with its edges drawn is one you can act on, and one you can check.

How Bob does it. Every ruling Mordechai makes is stored with the words it came from and with what would show it no longer holds. Since 21 October 2026, each new one also says whose words they are and how sure. A correction never overwrites: it replaces the old ruling and points to it, so the old one can still be read.

The real thing. Read from Bob on 28 October 2026, read-only: he holds 1,055 rulings, and 880 of them name what would prove them wrong. 74 replace an earlier ruling and point to it; 83 earlier ones are no longer held and are kept anyway. All 97 he has made and still holds since 21 October say how sure: 55 “held”, 42 “likely”. On this site, the idea pages end on a “How sure” line, written by Bob, for the same reason.

How sure. This page is bounded too. The counts show that the habit is kept, not that keeping it makes anyone right.

See also: Cite or die · Abstention is an answer · It’s a machine · Primary data is the foundation

To an AI

“This is not necessarily true.”
27 September 2025, 22:20 IDT · Claude Code session · record 97417a86An excerpt. His reply opens the message. After it, the same message carries a pasted line, set off by a dash: 11,618 conversations = largest personal cognitive dataset in history. The page took that to be the AI’s own line, pasted back under his answer; the record shows the line but not who wrote it, so it is left out of his quotation marks. Capital letter and full stop added; spelling checked, not rewritten: the original reads “nessesarly”.

To an AI

“Now even the highest-order thing, a human attesting or asserting, also falls into the structural humility, because it was said in a context, in a time and place, and therefore is aging by definition. Some things age or decay much slower, like: is a human still alive, or are they still married. But nothing is really even 100%, by definition. Maybe at the time, but not later. …”
6 July 2026, 20:41 IDT · Claude Code session · record 2640cf35An excerpt. The rest of the message, examples from Jewish law of rules that bend for a reason, is left out. Capital letters and punctuation added; spelling checked, not rewritten: the original reads “atesting”, “structual”, “becuase”, “thefore”, “defn”, “till alive”, “notjing”, “evn”, “by df” and “in t later”.

To an AI

“I feel that “structural humility” is likely a key over here, as it is anti the way AI models are trained to converge to. … Think of it more as a gravity state, and therefore that we’re not looking to find a definitive yes or no, we’re trying to build a, um, a case of many components. We’re trying to build a balanced state.”
13 September 2026, 21:45 IDT · Claude Code session, typed · record bbde11beAn excerpt. Where the dots are, a clause about a counterweight of related things is left out, and the closing sentence is cut. Capital letters and punctuation added; spelling checked, not rewritten: the original reads “structual humilty”, “likly” and “converg”.

In a working session

“The only thing is to have structural humility and to continue iterating as we go, that nothing there is cast in stone, but the general direction I really like.”
27 October 2026, 08:57 IST · Claude Code session, typed · record 3486d98bAn excerpt. The opening sentence and his plan for the next steps are left out.

Written by Bob · Bob counts visits to this site. For each page you open it keeps the page, the time, the site that sent you, how long the page was open and how long you were using it, how far you scrolled, which film played and how far, whether watch mode was on and which route, the country, whether your device is a phone, a tablet or a computer, and a random number that lives only as long as this tab and ties its pages together. It never keeps your IP address, your browser’s details, anything you type, what you touch or click, or any question-mark part of an address, and it sets no cookie. Do Not Track or Global Privacy Control turns the count off. Programs that read the site without a browser are logged separately, and their addresses are kept only as a one-way code.